Abstract
The article discusses some aspects of warehousing object descriptions having significant innovation potential. The procedure for selecting such descriptions consists of two consecutive phases. The first phase involves generating effective search queries with a special genetic algorithm (GAP). In the second phase, the model developed determines the index of innovativeness of an object archetype. Meanwhile the values of additive selection criteria are calculated. In the former case, the criterion is a fitness function of GAP. In the latter case, the criterion is the index of innovativeness. The purpose of the article is to justify the additive criterion applicability for calculating the value of the GAP fitness function. The article describes general conditions of applying additive evaluation criteria and shows how these conditions are met for the GAP fitness function. The analysis of the partial criteria gives grounds to assert their additive independence and, therefore, the correct use of additive n-dimensional utility function. Some additional reasons for applying additive criterion are also given. In general, the article proposes a unified approach to generating global assessment criteria and the relevance of unified formal structure is shown. The models presented in the article are used to develop adequate computational algorithms for the developed data warehouse support system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
P. C. Fishburn, Utility Theory for Decision Making (Wiley, New York, 1970).
S. Shahryar and Y. Parsia, ‘‘Modified weighted sum method for decisions with altered sources of information,’’ Math. Stat. 7 (3), 57–60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2019.070301
V. V. Podinovskiy, ‘‘Sensitivity of multi-criteria choice to changes in assessments of the importance of heterogeneous criteria,’’ Inform. Tekhnol. Nauke, Obrazov. Upravl. 4, 23–27 (2017) [in Russian].
E. V. Soboleva, ‘‘Modifications of generalized utility criteria in problems of identification of multicriteria choice,’’ Sist. Doslidzh. Inform. Tekhnol. 3, 58–65 (2012).
R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993).
P. C. Fishburn, ‘‘Independence in unity theory with whole product sets,’’ Operat. Res. 13, 28–45 (1965).
A. M. Anokhin, V. A. Glotov, V. V. Pavel’ev, and A. M. Cherkashin, ‘‘Methods for determination of criteria importance coefficients,’’ Avtom. Telemekh. 8, 3–35 (1997).
P. A. Gudkov, Benchmarking Methods (Penz. Gos. Univ., Penza, 2008).
S. V. Karpushkin, Design Decision Making Theory (TGTU, Tambov, 2015) [in Russian].
Jia Hongli, Song Xing, Gao Jian, Wang Qian, and Ma Quanyue, ‘‘Equipment management information system evaluation based on entropy weight method and AHP model,’’ in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Engineering (ICCSIE 2018) (2018), pp. 522–530. https://doi.org/10.23977/iccsie.2018.1070
Liu Heng, ‘‘Research on civil aviation security management system in dealing with air security threats,’’ in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Electronic Technology (ISET 2019) (2019), pp. 32–37. https://doi.org/10.23977/iset.2019.007
B. Al-Shargabi, O. Sabri, and S. Aljawarneh, ‘‘An enhanced arabic information retrieval using genetic algorithms: An experimental study and Results,’’ Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 7 (13), 242–248 (2013).
S. Brin and L. Page, ‘‘The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine,’’ Comput. Networks ISDN Syst. 30 (1–7), 107–117 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X
‘‘Method for node ranking in a linked database,’’ US Patent No. US7058628B1 (2006). https://patents.google.com/patent/US7058628B1/en.
K. Bryan and T. Leise, ‘‘The $25,000,000,000 Eigenvector: The linear algebra behind Google,’’ SIAM Rev. 48, 569–581 (2006).
J. M. Kleinberg, ‘‘Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment,’’ J. ACM 46, 604–632 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1145/324133.324140
T. Bury, Google PageRank—Democracy or Corporate Muscle? SitePoint (2003). http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/democracycorporate-muscle.
V. K. Ivanov, B. V. Palyukh, and A. N. Sotnikov, ‘‘Efficiency of genetic algorithm for subject search queries,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 37 (3), 244–254 (2016).
V. K. Ivanov and P. I. Meskin, ‘‘Implementation of a genetic algorithm for efficient documentary thematic search,’’ Progr. Produkty Sist. 4 (108), 125–134 (2014).
V. K. Ivanov, B. V. Palyukh, and A. N. Sotnikov, ‘‘Features of data warehouse support based on a search agent and an evolutionary model for innovation information selection,’’ in Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference on Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry IITI’19 (2019).
G. Salton, A. Wong, and C. S. Yang, ‘‘A vector space model for automatic indexing,’’ Commun. ACM 18 (11), 613–620 (1975).
Apache Solr Reference Guide. For Solr 8.1 (Apache Lucene/Solr Project, 2019).
Funding
This work was done at the Tver State Technical University with supporting of the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (projects nos. 18-07-00358 and 20-07-00199) and at the Joint Supercomputer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences—Branch of NIISI RAS within the framework of the State assignment (research topic 065-2019-0016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
(Submitted by A. M. Elizarov)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanov, V.K., Palyukh, B.V. & Sotnikov, A.N. Additive Criteria to Evaluate Relevance of Innovative Objects in Data Warehouse. Lobachevskii J Math 41, 2535–2541 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S199508022012015X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S199508022012015X